President Bush has vowed that before he leaves office he will find a peace resolution between Israel and the Palestinian territories. Paint me an optimist, but I disagree with all negative responses to Bush's dream. Most believe that this statement is to protect his legacy, but whats wrong with him trying to preserve his legacy if it could help bring a peace resolution to one of the most dangerous areas on the planet?
We can question the Presidents abilities and his reasons, but we cannot dispute the results that Bush promises. It might not work out, but I feel that all Americans hoping for a peace resolution should work with Bush instead of criticizing him for trying to do the right thing.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I believe that before leaving office Bush will try to implement any type of action that will attempt to begin the peace process, even though it will end up hurting the current situation in the middle east.
In Bush's last speech he was in favour of partition. Partition was tried before and was unsuccessful. By retrying failed plans, it will only set back the peace process further.
The future looks bleak for Israeli-American relations. Bush who is pro-Israel is now in favour of partition and many presidential candidates do not stress Israeli relations.
Bush has been a rotten president, but 9/11 showed him Israel was right on terrorism, and I don't see any signs of change on this.
I feel that Bush shouldn't try and get involved with the middle east, where it stands right now he has himself in a big enough mess in Iraq and should try and resolve that problem before trying to gain more peace in that area.
Good words.
Post a Comment